Does Part 107 Allow Autonomous Drone Flight

Does Part 107 Allow Autonomous Drone Flight?

In the dynamic airspace of today, the Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA) Part 107 has become a pivotal regulatory framework for drone operations in the United States.

This article delves into the intricacies of Part 107, focusing on its implications for autonomous drone flight.

Summary – Does Part 107 Allow Autonomous Drone Flight?

The Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA) Part 107 does not generally permit autonomous drone flight. It requires that drones remain within the visual line of sight (VLOS) of the operator or an appointed visual observer at all times during flight, limiting the potential for fully autonomous operations.

We will examine the visual line-of-sight requirements, explore recent updates, and discuss how the Remote ID rule influences operations beyond the visual line of sight (BVLOS), alongside the FAA’s ongoing efforts to integrate autonomous drones safely into the national airspace.

How to pass part 107

Part 107 Drone Restrictions

Under the Part 107 regulations, drone operations are subject to specific limitations that impact their use in various scenarios.

These include a weight limit for the drones, mandatory avoidance of manned aircraft, and the requirement to maintain visual line of sight with the drone at all times.

Everything To Pass First Time
Altitude University | Part 107 Online Prep Course
  • Pass the FAA Part 107 Exam - 99% Pass Rate
  • Interactive Drone Training Curriculum
  • Access Anywhere - Lifetime Online Access
  • Money-Back Guarantee if You Don't Pass
View Course Buy Now

Additional constraints restrict drone flights over people and simultaneous operation of multiple drones by a single pilot.

Weight Limit

The Federal Aviation Administration’s Part 107 regulations stipulate that drones must not exceed a maximum takeoff weight of 55 pounds.

This weight limit has significant implications for both the safety and the potential industry applications of drones.

Heavier drones could pose greater safety concerns, as their increased mass may result in more severe consequences in the event of an accident or collision.

Technological advancements, however, are pushing the capabilities of drones, challenging the current weight restrictions and leading to regulatory challenges as manufacturers seek to balance innovation with compliance.

In industries such as agriculture, surveying, and delivery services, the weight limit is a key factor in determining which drones can be legally and effectively used under the Part 107 framework.

Avoidance of Manned Aircraft

Regarding avoidance of manned aircraft, Part 107 mandates that drone operators must always yield the right-of-way to manned aircraft, ensuring no interference or collision risks arise during unmanned flight operations.

This highlights the safety considerations that are paramount when integrating autonomous flight technology into shared airspace.

The regulatory challenges associated with this integration necessitate advanced collision avoidance systems in drones, which are critical for maintaining safety standards.

As industry advancements progress, these systems become more sophisticated, helping to mitigate potential conflicts between manned and unmanned aircraft.

Nevertheless, the responsibility remains on drone operators to comply with regulations and ensure their use of autonomous technology does not compromise the safety of manned aviation.

Practical Part Of part 107 drone test

Visual Line of Sight

Part 107 of the FAA regulations stipulates that drones must remain within the visual line of sight (VLOS) of the operator or an appointed visual observer at all times during flight.

This unaided vision requirement means that the drone must be visible to the naked eye, without the assistance of any vision-enhancing devices such as binoculars.

While First Person View (FPV) technology offers a simulated cockpit view to operators, it does not negate the necessity for VLOS maintenance.

FPV technology limitations mean that an observer must still be able to physically see the drone in the airspace.

Operations that go beyond visual line of sight (BVLOS) are not generally permitted under Part 107 without a waiver, underscoring the importance of direct visual supervision in unmanned aerial operations.

Single Operation

Under Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) regulations, specifically Part 107, each pilot or visual observer is restricted to overseeing a single drone operation at any given time.

This rule underscores the FAA’s commitment to safety and is influenced by several factors:

  • Autonomous Capabilities: Despite technological advancements, current regulations maintain human oversight for each drone.
  • Operational Limitations: Limiting pilots to one drone helps manage the complexity and potential risks of drone operations.
  • Pilot Responsibilities: This ensures that the pilot can focus on operating the drone safely and in compliance with FAA regulations.
  • Safety Considerations: Reducing the risk of collisions and airspace violations by preventing divided attention.
  • Technological Advancements: As technology evolves, regulations may adapt, but currently, the single operation rule is firmly in place.
Practicing Flying A Drone For Part 107

Over People

Consistently, Part 107 of the FAA regulations prohibits the operation of drones directly over people who are not actively involved in the operation.

This rule underscores public safety concerns, ensuring a bystander’s well-being is not compromised by potential drone malfunctions or accidents.

While autonomous flight benefits such as increased efficiency and broader industry applications are recognized, technological advancements must be balanced with legal implications.

The FAA’s restrictions reflect a cautious approach to integrating drones into national airspace, especially when considering the risks to individuals on the ground.

Therefore, while autonomous drones promise to revolutionize many sectors, operators must navigate a regulatory environment that prioritizes safety over unchecked innovation.

Moving Aircraft or Vehicle

While autonomous drones offer significant advancements in operational efficiency, there are certain regulations and safety concerns that must be addressed.

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Part 107 regulations stipulate that drones must not be operated from a moving aircraft or vehicle, except in sparsely populated areas to mitigate risks to public safety.

Moving Vehicle: Operation from a moving vehicle is typically prohibited to maintain control and ensure safety.

Autonomous Flight: Technological advancements have enabled drones to fly autonomously, raising questions about regulatory compliance.

Safety Concerns: The dynamic environment of moving vehicles presents unique safety challenges that need to be addressed when operating drones.

Regulatory Compliance: Operators must adhere to Part 107 regulations to legally conduct drone operations and ensure public safety.

Technological Advancements: Despite technological progress, the FAA maintains strict guidelines to prioritize public safety over operational efficiency.

mavic pro infront of camera

Altitude and Speed

Transitioning from the operational constraints of moving vehicles, it should be noted that Part 107 also imposes specific limitations on altitude and speed to further ensure the safety of both unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) and the national airspace.

The maximum allowable altitude under Part 107 is 400 feet above the ground or within a 400-foot radius of a structure, while the speed must not exceed 100 mph.

These restrictions serve as critical safety measures, keeping the aircraft within safe operational bounds to minimize risks.

As autonomous navigation becomes more prevalent, adhering to these limits presents regulatory challenges amidst rapid technological advancements.

Consistent risk assessment is vital to maintain safety without stifling innovation, ensuring that as UAS capabilities expand, they do so within a framework that prioritizes the collective security of the airspace.

Night Operations

Every drone operation under Part 107, including those at night, must adhere to stringent guidelines to ensure the safety of the airspace and compatibility with autonomous technologies.

Nighttime operations introduce unique safety concerns that necessitate careful planning and adherence to Part 107 regulations.

As technological advancements continue to enhance autonomous drones, the integration of these systems into night operations remains a focus for regulators to maintain a high standard of safety.

  • Pre-flight Checks: Ensure all systems, especially navigation lights, are operational.
  • Visual Line-of-Sight: Maintain visual contact with the drone to manage risks effectively.
  • Anti-Collision Lighting: Autonomous drones must have lighting visible for three miles.
  • Pilot Certification: Operators must have an up-to-date Part 107 certificate.
  • Risk Mitigation: Implement strategies to minimize potential hazards during nighttime flights.
everything to pass drone

Weather Visibility

Part 107 regulations consistently require a minimum weather visibility of three miles from the control station for drone operations.

This legal requirement is a crucial safety measure to ensure that the operator maintains adequate situational awareness and reduces the risk of collisions.

Adhering to these visibility standards is especially important for flight planning, as unfavorable weather conditions can significantly impact a drone’s performance and the pilot’s ability to control it safely.

Drone technology continues to advance, but pilots must still comply with these legal requirements to maintain the safety and integrity of national airspace.

It is imperative that drone operators monitor weather conditions closely and adjust their flight plans accordingly to align with Part 107 stipulations.


Often, adherence to Part 107 regulations involves understanding the specific airspace restrictions that apply to unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), which can affect the execution of autonomous drone flights.

Considering the safety concerns and the need for integration into the National Airspace System (NAS), these restrictions are crucial for both current operations and future advancements in drone technology.

  • Class G airspace: Autonomous flights permitted without ATC permission
  • Class B, C, D, and E airspace: ATC permission required for operations
  • Autonomous flight regulations: Ensure safe coexistence with manned aircraft
  • Safety concerns: Paramount in congested or sensitive airspaces
  • Commercial applications: Must adhere to airspace restrictions to maintain safety and compliance

Adapting to these regulations is essential for the growth and viability of commercial UAV applications under Part 107.

94fb5794 57e8 4d1b a3cb 58609fe898af

Pilot Certification

Understanding airspace limitations under Part 107 is critical. Equally important is the requirement that drone operators must hold a remote pilot airman certificate to legally conduct autonomous flights.

This pilot certification confirms that the operator is knowledgeable about drone restrictions, including the weight limit for small unmanned aircraft systems (UAS), which must not exceed 55 pounds.

Additionally, certified pilots are trained in the avoidance of manned aircraft, a fundamental safety principle.

To further ensure safety, Part 107 mandates that even during autonomous operations, the drone must remain within the visual line of sight of the remote pilot or an observer who is in direct communication with the pilot.

This requirement mitigates the risk of incidents in the shared airspace.

Preflight Inspection

A thorough preflight inspection is mandated by Part 107 to ensure all drone systems function properly before initiating any autonomous flight operations.

Complying with this directive involves several critical steps that align with the overarching goal of maintaining operational safety standards.

The remote pilot in command must adhere to:

  • Equipment requirements to verify the drone’s fitness for the intended flight.
  • A comprehensive maintenance checklist to address any potential issues preemptively.
  • Proper inspection documentation to log and track the drone’s condition over time.
  • Implementation of pre-flight safety procedures to mitigate risks beforehand.
  • A systematic risk assessment process to evaluate and manage any operational hazards.
Studying for part 107


Under Part 107 regulations, before any autonomous drone flight can commence, the aircraft must be duly registered with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).

This is a critical safety measure that ensures each drone can be identified and linked to an operator, thereby enforcing accountability.

Registration acknowledges the pilot’s responsibilities to adhere to FAA regulations, including remote ID requirements.

These requirements are pivotal for maintaining visibility and control of the aircraft, particularly with the line of sight limitations that come with autonomous operations.

Compliance with these rules is non-negotiable, as it supports the overarching goal of ensuring the safety of national airspace.

Operators must understand that registration is not just a formality but a fundamental part of the legal and safe operation of drones under Part 107.

Remote ID

Consequently, operators must routinely ensure that their drones are equipped with Remote ID to comply with Part 107 regulations during autonomous flight.

The Remote ID serves as a digital license plate, providing critical information to authorities and ensuring accountability in the airspace.

This technological feature is vital for both drone safety and addressing privacy concerns.

  • Broadcasting Location: Remote ID sends real-time location data of both the drone and the control station.
  • Identification: It allows for the identification of the drone by law enforcement.
  • Airspace Awareness: Enhances safety by providing situational awareness to other airspace users.
  • Compliance: Ensures operators are meeting their legal requirements under Part 107.
  • Privacy Balance: Strikes a balance between operational transparency and privacy of drone operators.
9ad83648 e1c6 49e1 a062 276ae3e420cd

Visual Line of Sight Requirement

The Visual Line of Sight (VLOS) requirement in Part 107 mandates that drone operators must keep their aircraft within their unaided vision during flight.

Everything To Pass First Time
Altitude University | Part 107 Online Prep Course
  • Pass the FAA Part 107 Exam - 99% Pass Rate
  • Interactive Drone Training Curriculum
  • Access Anywhere - Lifetime Online Access
  • Money-Back Guarantee if You Don't Pass
View Course Buy Now

This provision serves to enhance the safety of both the drone operation and the national airspace by enabling the operator to maintain direct control and situational awareness.

Questions about the inclusion of First-Person View (FPV) technology and the specifics regarding who is responsible for maintaining VLOS, as well as the absence of a defined maximum distance, are critical points for further discussion.

Unaided Vision

In accordance with Part 107 regulations, autonomous drone flights are restricted by the requirement that the drone remain within the visual line of sight of the operator or a visual observer at all times during operation.

This unaided vision criterion is pivotal in ensuring the safety and compliance of autonomous flights under current drone regulations.

The remote pilot must be capable of maintaining a clear, unobstructed view of the drone without the assistance of any vision-enhancing devices, excluding corrective lenses.

  • Unaided Vision: The drone must be visible to the naked eye.
  • Autonomous Flight: Operationally limited by the visual line of sight rule.
  • Remote Pilot: Must have the drone within sight at all times.
  • Drone Regulations: Require visual contact without aids.
  • Visual Observer: May assist the remote pilot in maintaining visual line of sight.

Purpose of VLOS

Understanding the rationale behind the visual line of sight (VLOS) requirement is essential for ensuring the safe operation of autonomous drones under Part 107 regulations.

VLOS serves multiple benefits: it allows the operator to be aware of the drone’s location, monitor its altitude and direction, and to be vigilant of any potential hazards or other air traffic.

This requirement is a cornerstone of current aviation regulations, designed to mitigate the challenges of ensuring that drones do not pose a risk to people, other aircraft, or property.

While technological advancements suggest a future where autonomous flight may become more prevalent, the implementation of such capabilities must still address the safety concerns VLOS intends to resolve.

Compliance with VLOS remains a critical aspect of the responsible utilization of drone technology.

5c9e63f9 8d53 4248 8137 e9600c25e44d

Who Can Maintain VLOS

Under Part 107 regulations, maintaining visual line of sight (VLOS) is a responsibility that must be fulfilled by the designated remote pilot in command or by an appointed visual observer.

This critical requirement ensures safe operation and compliance with federal rules for unmanned aircraft systems (UAS).

To make this concept clearer, consider the following points:

  • Unaided Vision: VLOS must be maintained without the use of binoculars, ensuring immediate situational awareness.
  • Remote Pilot in Command: The primary person responsible for the drone must keep it in sight.
  • Visual Observer: An appointed person may assist in maintaining VLOS.
  • Recent Part 107 Updates: Stay informed as regulations evolve, potentially affecting VLOS requirements.
  • Role of Remote ID Rule: Enhances tracking and safety, complementing the purpose of VLOS.

Use of First-Person View (FPV) Technology

One must consider that while First-Person View (FPV) technology provides a unique perspective for the operator, it does not fulfill the visual line of sight (VLOS) requirement as mandated by Part 107 regulations.

Ensuring FPV technology and safety, the FAA stipulates that the use of FPV equipment does not eliminate the need for a visual observer to maintain direct, unaided visual contact with the drone.

This is fundamental to FPV regulations which prioritize safety and operational integrity.

Consequently, FPV equipment requirements must be paired with strict adherence to VLOS rules. FPV training and certification aim to address FPV challenges and solutions, reinforcing the importance of situational awareness and compliance with regulatory standards to enhance safety in national airspace.

No Specific Distance

The Visual Line of Sight (VLOS) requirement, integral to Part 107 regulations, does not prescribe a maximum distance, but mandates that the drone remain visible to the operator or visual observer without artificial enhancement other than corrective eyewear.

This stipulation raises several considerations:

  • Regulatory Challenges: Constantly updating to match advancements in drone technology.
  • Safety Concerns: Ensuring the drone does not pose a hazard to other airspace users.
  • Operational Limitations: Restricting the potential of drones for extended or beyond visual range missions.
  • Visual Aids: Not permitted, except for corrective lenses, to maintain the integrity of VLOS.
  • Drone Technology: As it advances, the gap between capabilities and regulations becomes a focal point for industry discussions.
Woman passing drone test

Use of Binoculars

FAA’s Part 107 regulations specify that the use of binoculars for maintaining visual line of sight with an unmanned aerial vehicle is restricted to temporary instances solely for enhancing situational awareness.

This limitation underscores the importance of direct, unaided visual contact in drone surveillance and operations.

The remote pilot in command, the individual manipulating the drone’s controls, or a designated visual observer may employ binoculars to briefly augment their view.

However, binoculars regulations prohibit their continuous use for the purpose of fulfilling the visual line of sight requirement.

This ensures that the visual observer responsibilities include active, ongoing monitoring of the drone’s flight path, airspace, and any potential hazards without over-reliance on vision aids, thereby maintaining operational safety and compliance with FAA standards.

Beyond Visual Line of Sight (BVLOS) Operations

We must recognize that Part 107 rules generally require drones to remain within the visual line of sight (VLOS) of the remote pilot or a designated observer to ensure safe operation.

However, as technological advancements and commercial applications push the boundaries, the interest in BVLOS operations grows.

To address the bvlos operational challenges and to comply with regulatory requirements, operators must adopt specific risk mitigation strategies.

  • Regulatory Requirements: Obtain a Part 107 BVLOS Waiver from the FAA.
  • Technological Advancements: Utilize reliable communication systems and advanced sensors.
  • Risk Mitigation Strategies: Implement redundant systems and fail-safes.
  • BVLOS Operational Challenges: Ensure robust control link against interference.
  • Commercial Applications: Expand use cases like infrastructure inspection and delivery services.

These considerations are crucial for integrating BVLOS flights into the national airspace safely and efficiently.

1972fd8a a8b1 4074 b4ba 5127d181baa0

Recent Part 107 Updates

Recent amendments to Part 107 regulations facilitate expanded operational capabilities for small unmanned aircraft, including flights over people and moving vehicles, as well as nighttime operations.

Through the part 107 waiver process, operators can seek permission for certain flights that may not be directly permissible under the current rules.

This process necessitates a thorough demonstration of safety considerations, ensuring that any proposed operation will not pose a hazard to other airspace users or people on the ground.

The regulatory framework is adapting to industry advancements, yet autonomous flight challenges remain a key concern.

While the recent updates to Part 107 do not specifically address autonomous drone operations, they do open the door for more complex applications, which may eventually include increased autonomy.

These changes signal a recognition of the technological strides made in the unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) sector and the FAA’s willingness to evolve its regulations accordingly.

However, the autonomy of drone flights is still an area that requires careful oversight. Operators seeking to push the boundaries of Part 107 with autonomous operations must still contend with the waiver process, where the ability to mitigate risks through alternative methods is crucial for approval.

9ad83648 e1c6 49e1 a062 276ae3e420cd

Role of Remote ID Rule

Building upon recent regulatory advancements, the Remote ID rule significantly enhances the potential for autonomous drone operations under Part 107 by mandating real-time identification and location broadcasting for drones.

This rule underpins the evolution of drone regulations to support more complex and potentially autonomous flights, which necessitates a robust framework for tracking and accountability.

  • Remote ID implementation challenges: Integrating new technology can be complex, with technical difficulties and potential costs for drone manufacturers and operators.
  • Privacy concerns with Remote ID rule: The broadcasting of location data could lead to apprehensions about surveillance and personal data security.
  • Impact of Remote ID on drone industry: This rule may drive innovation and compliance, but could also impose barriers for smaller operators due to costs or technical requirements.
  • Benefits of Remote ID for law enforcement: It greatly aids in the monitoring of airspace, allowing for quicker response to unauthorized or unsafe drone operations.
  • International adoption of Remote ID standards: Establishing a global consensus on Remote ID can streamline cross-border operations and set a precedent for international drone activities.

Through the implementation of the Remote ID rule, autonomous drone operations under Part 107 are poised to become more secure, accountable, and globally standardized, despite the challenges and concerns that accompany such regulatory changes.

Part 107 drone pilot taking thoery test

Line-of-Sight vs. BVLOS Operations

Transitioning from the context of the Remote ID rule, it becomes essential to differentiate between line-of-sight (VLOS) and beyond-visual-line-of-sight (BVLOS) operations as they relate to autonomous drone flight under Part 107 regulations.

VLOS operations mandate that the drone operator or a designated visual observer maintain unaided visual contact with the drone throughout its flight.

This requirement ensures the operator can manage the aircraft’s trajectory, monitor for potential hazards, and prevent endangerment to others.

In contrast, BVLOS operations allow drones to fly beyond the operator’s visual range. This capability is crucial for missions that cover extensive areas or require operations in remote locations.

For autonomous flight to be conducted safely under BVLOS conditions, the FAA requires operators to secure a waiver that affirms the utilization of alternative methods to maintain control and situational awareness.

Furthermore, there are specific circumstances where an EVLOS permit or a TBVLOS authorization can be applicable.

EVLOS permits involve a visual observer maintaining sight of the drone, facilitating communication with the operator. TBVLOS authorization is designed for critical situations where the operator may temporarily lose sight of the drone.

These provisions ensure that even when full autonomy and visual oversight are not simultaneously possible, drone operations remain within the safety parameters set by aviation authorities.

Federal aviation administration building

FAA’s Autonomous Integration Initiatives

As the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) moves forward with the integration of autonomous drones into the national airspace, a series of strategic initiatives have been established.

These programs, including the Unmanned Aircraft System Traffic Management (UTM) and the Next Generation Air Transportation System (NextGen), are pivotal in shaping the future of unmanned flight.

They not only address the technical and regulatory challenges but also lay the groundwork for advanced concepts such as Urban Air Mobility (UAM).

Unmanned Aircraft System Traffic Management (UTM)

The Unmanned Aircraft System Traffic Management (UTM) initiative is a key component of the Federal Aviation Administration’s efforts to integrate autonomous drone operations into the national airspace.

As the UTM system is developed, it faces several critical aspects:

  • UTM Challenges: Addressing safety, security, and privacy concerns while managing increasing drone traffic.
  • UTM Implementation: Establishing a phased approach to integrate UTM progressively with existing Air Traffic Management systems.
  • UTM Regulations: Crafting policies that ensure compliance while fostering innovation in unmanned flight.
  • UTM Infrastructure: Building the necessary physical and digital structures to support UTM operations.
  • UTM Data Exchange: Developing standardized protocols for information sharing among drones, operators, and the UTM network.

These elements are fundamental to the successful integration of autonomous drones within the national airspace system.

Integration of Civil Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) in the National Airspace System (NAS) Roadmap

FAA’s roadmap for the integration of civil Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) into the National Airspace System (NAS) underscores a commitment to facilitating autonomous drone operations while ensuring the safety and efficiency of the airspace.

This strategic plan recognizes the evolving landscape of UAS technology and the need to adapt regulations accordingly.

Key elements include:

  • Addressing weight restrictions to accommodate various UAS classes
  • Implementing standards for night operations
  • Setting clear guidelines for weather visibility conditions that drones must adhere to

Moreover, the roadmap emphasizes the importance of robust pilot certification processes and thorough preflight inspection protocols.

These measures aim to maintain high safety standards while progressively integrating autonomous UAS into the complex fabric of the NAS.

My Study materials for part 107 drone licence

Next Generation Air Transportation System (NextGen)

NextGen advances the Federal Aviation Administration’s initiatives to integrate autonomous drone operations into the National Airspace System with an emphasis on safety and efficiency.

As part of the NextGen implementation, the FAA is focusing on:

  • Developing robust Autonomous drone regulations to ensure secure and standardized operations.
  • Fostering Advanced air mobility integration, allowing for innovative uses of airspace.
  • Supporting Commercial space transportation through updated policies and infrastructure.
  • Implementing Safety measures for non-traditional users to maintain a high level of safety within the NAS.
  • Utilizing state-of-the-art technologies and procedures to increase the capacity and efficiency of the airspace.

These efforts aim to accommodate the evolving demands of aviation technology while preserving the integrity of the NAS.

Urban Air Mobility (UAM) Concept of Operations

While advancing the NextGen agenda, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has developed the Urban Air Mobility (UAM) Concept of Operations, a roadmap for integrating autonomous drones into urban environments.

This initiative outlines the necessary UAM infrastructure, addressing operational challenges to ensure seamless airspace integration.

It encompasses a regulatory framework tailored to support the safety and efficiency of autonomous aerial vehicles, which is paramount for public acceptance and successful implementation.

The FAA’s approach takes into account safety considerations that are inherent in densely populated areas, aiming to mitigate risks while promoting the innovative potential of UAM.

The goal is to craft a system where autonomous drones can operate reliably alongside crewed aircraft and other airspace users.

Everything To Pass First Time
Altitude University | Part 107 Online Prep Course
  • Pass the FAA Part 107 Exam - 99% Pass Rate
  • Interactive Drone Training Curriculum
  • Access Anywhere - Lifetime Online Access
  • Money-Back Guarantee if You Don't Pass
View Course Buy Now


In conclusion, Part 107 of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) regulations places strict limits on drone operations, including a requirement for visual line-of-sight (VLOS) control.

However, with the introduction of Remote ID rules and ongoing FAA initiatives, there is a gradual progression towards integrating beyond visual line-of-sight (BVLOS) and autonomous drone technologies into the national airspace.

This signals a transformative phase in unmanned aerial systems regulation and a potential expansion of operational capabilities in the future.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *